Unemployment In Saudi Arabia And The Uk Economics Essay

Unemployment In Saudi Arabia And The Uk Economics Essay This essay will discuss a macroeconomic issue that affect to government economy. Understanding this issue is related to understand some general concept about the economic first. What is economic, what it divided to and how it related to government issues. Then after understanding these general ideas will focus on unemployment issue, what it is and how it affect to government economy. After that a comparison between unemployment in Saudi Arabia and unemployment in UK. In order to understand the issue in these countries using an analysis tool in necessary which will be PEST analysis in order to relies the reasons why that issue is important and the reason of it also. First of all what is economic, economics is a way to find how people lives process in that way which the live now. It is a measurement tool used by economics to know more about how people live. Also to find out the influences of some factors that could change these process to be better. Economics is mainly contain two part which are Macroeconomic and Microeconomic, and each part is focus on different way of study area. Macroeconomic is a field of study which related to governmental issues economy or globally and how economy fluctuate. The purpose of study macroeconomics in to understand and be able to analyze some issues such as national income, unemployment, inflation, rate of growth and price level. On the other hand, Microeconomics is discuss people decisions which related to the market. The aim of study Microeconomics is to define services and goods quantity and price, and also to discover the effect of government rules and taxes to the goods and services price, as an example of what Microeconomics study are cars prices and demand, telecom and electricity. In this essay will discuss one of Macroeconomic issue in two different countries which are Saudi Arabia and UK. The issue will focus on is unemployment, and the reasons of this issue. Then considering how it affect to the government economics. According to Donald Rutherford in his book Dictionary of Economics, he define unemployment as the stat of being part of a labor force, wanting to work, but without a job.( Rutherford, 1992, p. 473) Unemployment is defined as person who is available to work, looking for a job and does not have a job now. And some countries add more conditions to define person as unemployment, such as in Saudi Arabia mention that the person account as unemployment if the previous conditions apply on him and he accept the minimum rate of salary. And in UK they define unemployment as In the United Kingdom the definition of unemployment is someone who is in receipt of the jobseekers allowance (Parkin et al , 1997). Unemployment. Unemployment is a major problem that could affect to government economy, there are different side of that affect. Unemployment could affect to government policy, social relationships between people, economic growth, productivity and technology development. In this essay will use a tool to analyze this issue through the chosen countries and how it affect. PEST Analysis. PEST analysis based on four factors which are : Political : and it consist of governmental regulations and laws, government type and political change. Economic : which consist of growth, labor supply and labor costs. Social : and contains population growth, health and education. Technology : contain impact of technology and productivity. Unemployment in the United Kingdom. Unemployment in the UK actually is not a new problem or happen recently it started years ago and it fluctuated in high percentage to low percentage during 1855 to 1994. According to C.H.Feinstein, he mention that the percentages of unemployment in the UK changed from time to time. It reach the highest percentage in 1935 where it was 15% and almost 0% during 1945. Both of them have it own political reasons at that time. Political. There are many reasons that leads to unemployment, first political reasons: government always centralize the governmental organizations and businesses to be inside the big cities and rather than smaller one or rural side which affect that most people leave these village and move to live in big cities. And thatà ¢Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¡Ã‚ ¬Ãƒ ¢Ã¢â‚¬Å¾Ã‚ ¢s affect to most businesses and market be only in big cities and then this country lose one or more of public sectors like education for example, and that what happen in the UK actually. Most of population be in big cities and the most of universities opened in big cities, then it will lead to lack of knowledge between people who lives in these places and cannot offer to let their children to lean in cities cause of expensive. Economic. Also there are economics reasons for unemployment in the UK, labor market are always linked with economy of these country. For example, the salary for employee in a rich country is different than other who could do the same job but in poor country. Employee lose their motivation to work because of the low payment and that affect to the company or organization productivity. Another economic reason of high percentage of unemployment is the credit crunch. Since the credit crunch happen and most of companies affected of it, they try hard to adjust their balance and the only way to do that is end a lot of their employee contract. The next chart shows that the percentages of unemployment is start to increase sharply when the world affected by credit crunch. http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Temp/United-Kingdom-Unemployment-Rate-Chart-000001.png?0b055430-d250-4215-93a4-27094745a09b Technology. Also the technology affect to spread the unemployment in United Kingdom in different ways. A lots of companies nowadays work hard to introduce machines to their company instead of human. The companies managers have their own point of view, the managers think that these electronic machines work more than the humans and at that time the productivity of the company will raise tribal. The human employee work 8 hours daily but these machines could work without break time or stop during 24 hours. Also the costs of this machines is lower than human and for future the expenses will reduce and the profit will increase and that what private sectors looking for. The new generations of robot employee will increase the rate of unemployment in UK. Social. Lora a student in a university were graduate recently from a law school. She works hard to find a job in a lawyer office, but unfortunately for her she graduate when the percentage of unemployment is high. As she not born in a rich family and cause of shortage of money she works in a clothes shop. Years after another trying hard to find a job that she looking for, but after a while she find herself stuck in the clothes shop because she cannot compete the new graduates law students. Previous example is shows how can unemployment affect socially, Lora found a solution for her problem in her way but others could not handle the unemployment like Lora. Rises of crime, alcoholism and violence are reflect of people who are jobless and have nothing to do. People who are unemployment and deal with this situation in wrong way by dealing a drug for example, easy money will be in their hand and they will never think of find a job but they will act in different way to try hard to make the worker be addict and then they will be a jobless cause they cannot do their job in the right way. If the unemployment increase the social problem will increase as will. Unemployment in the Saudi Arabia. Unemployment in Saudi Arabia in a new problem actually, the government did not face that huge increasing in unemployment like what happen recently. Unemployment rate in Saudi Arabia reach the highest percentage in Dec 2009 when reach almost 10.5 % , where the lowest percentage was during 1999 when reach 8.1 %. There are many reasons that affect to the unemployment to raise in Saudi Arabia. http://www.tradingeconomics.com/Temp/Saudi-Arabia-Unemployment-Rate-Chart-000002.png?cd318801-9e82-4d60-b5a6-41ce6853181e Political. Because of Saudi Arabia more than 50 % of its total area are desert, government did not make much effort to consider that the people who live in these areas are jobless. There is no industries inside these areas and those people who lived in desert which named Bedouins most of them are unemployment. They did not study or finish their graduation year cause of their culture enforce them to stay in their land to implant or raising camel through their childhood. They grown up and the time is change and they cannot depend on what their father used to do, but also they are not capable to work cause of lack of education. Economic. Saudi Arabia are like all other countries which affected by credit crunch, but because of the government regulations the private organizations cannot fired these employee before their contract will end. Then they companies use different way to reduce the number of the employee by adding more work to do for them. Actually that idea reduce the employee because most of them resign from work and also the company save more money than they expect. Many organization do that strategy and number of unemployment raise. Another reason of high percentage of unemployment is foreign labor. Some company hire a foreign labor cause of low cost of them and the high skills or professional employee can costs nothing comparing with local employee and with high experience in foreigner side. Technology. Technology is important in any organization in different way especially in industrial sectors. And because there are no much Saudis skilled employee who can work in these sectors, the organizations replace hiring Saudis with foreigner. Most of Saudis cannot handle to use technology in their work, not at this time actually, that raise the percentage of unemployment. Companies always looking to professionals in a way of reduce the cost of labor by using technology. Social.

What Makes Jack Welch an Effective Leader? Essay -- GCSE Business Mark

What Makes Jack Welch an Effective Leader? ---ideas from the article â€Å"Will Legacy Live On?† Before I talk about what makes Jack an effective leader, I want to explain briefly why I chose him as my study subject. Why do I like him? Jack Welch created a new model for business leaders everywhere. His genius leadership and management techniques are an example to anyone aspiring to a successful career. Why is he so famous? He became the youngest CEO and Chairman of one of America's biggest and most respected companies (General Electric) at age 44, and successfully rewrote the rules of what an incredibly profitable and successful company should be, and had fun in the process. What is leadership? To know what makes an effective leader, one must know what leadership is. According to our textbook, the definition of leadership is the ability to influence a group towards the achievement of goals. In this case, the group is General Electronic Corporation. For a big business empire like GE, obviously, the final goal is to make as much profit as it can to please its shareholders. Let’s see what the article describes about how Jack influences his team to achieve this goal: â€Å"Growing a company that was valued by the market at $13 billion when he took it over in 1981 to a behemoth worth more than $400 billion when he retired last year is what is called wealth creation – big time.† Without Jack, GE couldn’t have today’s accomplishment. What makes Jack be a leader? †¢ Personality According to the â€Å"trait theories of leadership† in the textbook, six traits have been identified as being consistently associated with leadership: 1) ambition and energy; 2) the desire to lead; 3) honesty and integrity; 4) self-confidence; ... ...world has become extremely fast and full of change. If the leader can’t adapt to changing conditions, it is very possible for his firm to be kicked out of the game. How can the firm change, though? The most effective way is to go through new ideas. Here, it reminders me Welch’s famous saying: "Change before you have to." †¢ Arts At last, I want to quote my favorite part in this article, which the following, Leadership is not a science. It’s not a recipe. It’s not the five rules about this or the six effective habits of that. It’s an art, and as Georges Braque wrote, the only thing that matters in art is the part that can’t be explained.† The only reason that I like this part is that I don’t need to apply any leadership theory here. My conclusion is that he is a very effective leader. If I were to become a successful CEO, I would follow his example.

Man Is Not Truly One, but Truly Two’. Discuss This Observation on Human Nature

For many centuries now many people as well as philosophers have wondered what factors make up human nature and the human mind along with its thinking. Man is truly a complex ‘individual’, as every man has their own reasons for living, and the many reasons they have for doing what it is that they do. Has human beings we posses certain characteristics, and it is important to identify these characteristics in the discussion of human nature. As we are made up of thoughts and ideas, as it is our thoughts and ideas that causes us to act out on what it is we truly want to do.This essay will compare contrast two different forms of writing within the same era. â€Å"The Curious Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde† and â€Å"The Importance of Being Earnest† it is interesting to see these two different forms of writing manage to capture different cycles of human nature, and still manage to somewhat correlate. Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, portray a robust sense of loss or confusio n of ‘identity’ in the very popular novel, written by Robert-Louise Stevenson. For its time, the topic of human nature was something that various authors offered their opinions on.The likes of Charles Dickens through his novel â€Å"Great Expectations† deals with a numerous amount of characters and their journey through life, and their constant battle with their own identity and nature. The novel deals with a great sense of ‘Darwinism’ there is no mistake in saying that Stevenson was influenced my Darwin’s controversial theory on evolution, and how man came into being. â€Å"Nor is there any substantial change when, in Stevenson’s Jekyll and Hyde, the evil follows from the good. The two are the same. Jekyll is, to begin with, a good man. It was†¦the exacting nature of my aspirations rather than any particular degradation in my faults, that made me what I was. † Yet â€Å"when I looked upon that ugly idol in the glass, I was conscience of no repugnance, rather of a leap of welcome. This, too, was myself. It seemed natural and human. In my eyes it bore a livelier image of the spirit, it seemed more express and single, than the imperfect and divided countenance I had been hitherto accustomed to call mine. † From Massey’s critical analysis it is clear to see what argument he brings forth.The first thing that springs out most are how he describes evil and good being one in the â€Å"same†, the fact that one comes before the other, the ‘other’ deriving from the first. The notion of a man at first being good and then turning evil, must then mean that within good, bad is laying dormant. This argument can easily fit into the discussion of human nature. A classic example can be found in the bible story of Kane and Able in Genesis chapter 4 through to 16. Both characters are depicted as the classic ‘good vs. vil’ although both people where trying to please God, one d ecides to take his brothers life out of jealousy. The important thing to note here is that, they both had the same intention, pleasing God. Furthermore, the quotation included in Massey’s interpretation is also interesting and important for the discussion of human nature. Dr Jekyll himself talks about his own pleasures in the body of Mr Hyde. He describes him as an ‘idol’ something or someone that he looks up to. He also says in his statement that, â€Å"it seemed natural and human† and that he felt welcomed by the presence of Hyde.I believe that through these statements Stevenson was exploring the different ‘consciousness of man’ and how man longs for power and the longing to do something different and utterly outrageous. The social class of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde is also something that one must take into consideration when reading this novel. The simple fact that both these characters are not in the lower class of their Victorian society is v ery important. Mr Hyde commits various different crimes, that wouldn’t normally be associated with a man of his social standards.This aspect allows the novel to be considered as something out of the norm for the society in which he wrote in. An article on the Internet by Joel Joyce, talks about the contestant battle between good and evil. These are two aspects about human nature that are always at loggerheads in, literature, films, and theatre. There is a sense of both characteristics in human beings. When we look at criminals and law-abiding citizens, we often wonder what separates the two. â€Å"Most people would agree that at least some people are bad: chronic criminals residing in Jackson State Prison, ruthless Colombian drug lords, and inner city gang leaders.But what about the productive members of society, law abiding citizens, family people who respect the rights of others and the authority of the law? Where do they fall on the spectrum between good and bad? If we as ked this question in a random poll, people would give a range of answers. Some would say that man is basically good, except for a few deranged people like those mentioned; others would say that man is mostly good, but there is also a little bit of evil in all of us; still others would assert that man is neutral—family and social influences determine his inclination toward goodness or evil.A few people might even believe that man’s natural propensity is toward evil. † In this article I couldn’t help but notice some certain similarities between some of the points and some of the issues raised in Stevenson’s Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde, the fact that everyman is capable of doing evil, and that being good and evil are in fact choices that one can make in his/her lifetime. Mr Hyde did not come from just anywhere; he was more than an alter ego. He was the ‘evil’ that ‘apparently’ lives in everyman. The notion that everyman is pointing towards evil is quiet visible in Mr Hyde’s statement of the case in the tenth chapter. There was something strange in my sensations, something indescribably new and, from its very novelty, incredibly sweet. I felt younger, lighter, happier in body; within I was conscious of a heady recklessness, a current of disordered sensual images running like a millrace in my fancy, a solution of the bonds of obligation, an unknown but not an innocent freedom of the soul.I knew myself, at the first breath of this new life, to be more wicked, tenfold more wicked, sold a slave to my original evil; and the thought, in that moment, braced and delighted me like wine. From this statement made by Dr Jekyll himself, not Hyde, it illustrates to us that, ‘man is definitely not one and is two’ the fact that Jekyll embraces this new body and relishes at its prospects must then mean that there is an element of evil lurking within everyman, even someone as responsible and respectable as Mr Hyde felt for this honey trap, if you call it. He also describes this ordeal as â€Å"freedom of the soul†. What this can reveal to us about man is that, we long to be free of the restrictions of the society hat we live in. he states that he felt â€Å"younger, lighter† and â€Å"happier† in this body. Notably Dr Jekyll boldly says â€Å"to my original evil† which instantly portrays to us that this is his roots and his original state as a human being, so then the question comes to mind that is in fact Dr Jekyll an alter ego of Mr Hyde or the other way round?So within this statement there is an element of ‘escapism’, which is normally found amongst people who suffer from (MPD) multiple personality disorder. According to an article on wisegeek. om these are some qualities of someone who suffers from multiple personality disorder. â€Å"Multiple personality disorder is almost always caused by persistent trauma, or past trauma such as early chi ldhood sexual or physical abuse. When trauma occurs over a long period of time, the affected person may begin to cope by completely disassociating from the events that cause the trauma. This can lead to â€Å"alters,† separate personalities within the same person who either are aware of, or are unaware of the abuse. Alters can be childlike, strong, male, or female, and often emerge as a coping device. There are a couple of important factors to take notes on in this article. Firstly, the article states that, â€Å"the same person who either are aware of, or are unaware† this is something that can be linked back to Mr Hyde and Jekyll, they are both ‘aware’ of each other’s personality co-existing within the same body. The most interesting thing about Dr Jekyll is that he is still conscience within the conscienceless of Hyde. He has the will power to take over if he really wanted. But he played it out in such a way that he was the weaker of the two. Thi s is the second point, â€Å".This can lead to â€Å"alters,† separate personalities within the same person†¦ aware of, or are unaware of the abuse†¦Ã¢â‚¬  Massey goes into more detail about this very same point, and which is also pointing towards the direction of the multiple personality disorder, although his argument does somewhat go against this interpretation of (MPD). â€Å"Inevitably, this argument will seem to have some relation to the insistence of the existentialists that man is finally alone, and that all his apparent duality, which provides him with an imaginary interlocutor from the eginning, is only a protective delusion to help him cope with his basic loneliness. The difference is, first, that in my conception man is not lonely, but unitary; he is afraid, not of having no one to communicate with him and thus to support his existence, but of having no choice of selves. † What this offers and suggests about human nature is that there seems to b e a strong sense of ‘duality’ involved in all man. The fact that he states that man does not want to be alone; there is a need of companionship within ones-self, which may explain the reason why Jekyll did not have the strength to over power Hyde.The final statement is a very strong one. â€Å"†¦But of having no choice of selves† this is Massey’s final argument, which in a sense points to the direction of ‘Darwinism’. The fact that ‘Man’ is the final state of human being, who supposedly evolved from apes. There seems to be a longing for something more. Furthermore, the sheer fact that Hyde is described as being â€Å"ape like†¦Ã¢â‚¬  and â€Å"like a monkey jumped† does illustrate that Stevenson had reversed the line of evolution. In contrast to this, The Importance Of being Earnest by Oscar Wilde deals with some quiet different human characteristics.There is no coincidence between the protagonists name and the books title. One must first identify the meaning behind the actual name. ‘Earnest’ According to Dictionary. com, here are the different meanings and interpretations of what Earnest means. Adjective 1. Serious in intention, purpose, or effort; sincerely zealous: an earnest worker. 2. Showing depth and sincerity of feeling: earnest words; an earnest entreaty. 3. Seriously important; demanding or receiving serious attention. –Noun 4. Full seriousness, as of intention or purpose: to speak in earnest.The characters name works as a pun, which automatically gives us a hint that there are two different characters at work here. When we are first introduced to the character the audience is expecting a character that is sincere and true to ‘our own belief of what earnestness truly is. According to a chapter on Earnestness, by Walter E. Houghton, â€Å"Now, patently, Old Leisure was not in earnest. He was not, as one would say, taking life seriously. And that means, w e see, that intellectually he has no concern whatever with ideas.He goes to church either to fall asleep or to repeat the great doctrines of the creed without a moment’s attention or an ounce of sincere conviction†¦he is quiet oblivious to any larger scheme of human destiny, whether natural or supernatural, and to what duties or responsibilities it might entail. His conscience, therefore, is quiet easy; and his daily life is devoted to the enjoyment of sensual pleasure. † Through this statement we gain more of an insight into the character of Ernest, Jack. He is the complete opposite of what the audience thinks he should be.In Act 1 scene eight, Jack (Ernest) is accused of having something, which does not belong to him. Through the dialogue it is revealed to us that, Ernest has been living a double life. â€Å"Well, my name is Ernest in town and Jack in the country, and the cigarette case was given to me in the country. † This is clearly included for a reaso n; firstly it shapes the play into what it truly is. But also there is also an element of ‘duality’ involved in this, just like Stevenson’s â€Å"The curious Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde† the element of living a double life and ultimately becoming different people.Unlike Dr Jekyll he has had and made a ‘choice’ to live this double life, by creating an alter ego for himself named Jack. It is important to identify what an alter ego is, and what the writer is trying to achieve by giving Ernest an alter ego. Having an alter ego at times can be beneficial, provided it does not go overboard. It gives the person a sense of completeness. However, if the alter ego is more perfect than your real self, then it can result in low self-esteem. It is also at times seen that if the alter ego is dominating, then it can prevent a person from leading a normal life.If you have an alter ego then it is important that you don’t let it dominate over your pers onal life. This can affect your friends and family in a negative manner. As we can see from this detailed analysis on what an alter ego is, we can understand in more detail why Ernest’s character would want to create an alter ego for himself in the two different towns. It could be argued that Jack feels a certain connection and belonging to the village as it allows him to do exactly what he wants.This can also be seen a s a criticism of the Victorian society suggesting that people are not allowed to be themselves in certain environment and places. Furthermore, there is still an element of ‘duality’ within Jacks real name Ernest. Through Algernon’s statement. â€Å" You answer to the name of Ernest. You look as if your name was Ernest. You are the most earnest person I ever saw in my life. † Through the use of wit Wilde delivers a ‘funny’ juxtaposition, Algernon is accusing Jack of being a liar and a fraud, but yet calls him an earnest p erson, which is the direct opposite of what he should be saying.Instead a moral paradox is created. Earnestness, which refers to the quality of being serious and the quality of being sincere, is thrown around in the play, and characters like Jack, who the word is normally associated with is seen as a hypocrite as he is just the opposite of what the word is. This is part of Wilde’s plan of comment on the Victorian society and the nature of the ‘men’ who lived in that society. â€Å"More than half of modern culture depends on what shouldn’t read† This statement made by the character Algernon subtly mocks the Victorian society as their rules where strict on what should and shouldn’t be done.Which then calls into question the whole idea of ‘earnestness’ in men. These characters presented to us are men and woman who are of a certain class, higher class, and they are supposed to be men and woman of high regards, but the majority of the time they are seen as hypocrites and untrue. This could be an attempt to destabilize men and call into question human nature as whole. In addition, the class system is also called into question, through Algernon’s statement. â€Å"Really, if the lower orders don’t set us a good example, what on earth is the use of them?They seem, as a class, to have absolutely no sense of moral responsibility. † There are two things here about human nature that is worth discussing. The first half of the quote is on leadership. Oscar Wilde, here talks of how humans have a sense of ‘neediness’ and a certain longing to be lead, but something interesting happens here, rather than the higher class leading the lower class it is the other way round, a sense of hierarchy has been switched round to the opposite side of the spectrum. The second half of this quote is also equally important.This is a ‘typical’ statement for someone of a higher class to make about the lower classed. â€Å"†¦They seem, as a class, to have absolutely no sense of moral responsibility. † Wilde is clever here; I believe that he knew that his statement prior to this about the lower class being an example for the higher classed individuals. This statement was quiet common for a higher classed member of society to make towards a lower classed member. A vivid example of Victorian human nature at work in its society. Homosexuality is a great factor in Oscar Wilde’s work.The fact that he tried to cover up the homosexual tendencies that Jack and Algernon both possessed, and instead turned them into brothers at the end. Their constant bickering was more than what it seemed it became flirting. It is no mistaking that Wilde himself was an homosexual, and according to some other writers he too struggled with acceptance within his society, which led him to lead a double life. â€Å"Wilde's need for social acceptance may have been a factor in his 1884 marri age to a young, somewhat conventional and naive socialite, Constance Lloyd, a union that quickly produced two sons. It is then no secret that Wilde in creating these characters was a microcosm of his own life, Jack lived a double life, Which illustrates to me that he too struggled with acceptance in the village and city where he bears two different names. Finally, Stevenson’s and Wilde’s work both offer different issues that man goes through. In â€Å"The Importance of Being Earnest† the themes of homosexuality and truthfulness dealt with, is something that was relevant to his society and is still relevant today. Homosexuals still struggle with acceptance be it through family, friends or society.Furthermore, not only homosexuals feel this, and I believe that this is something that Wilde wanted to portray through his work. Acceptance is a part of ‘Human Nature’ that all men go through, just as a child wants to be accepted by friends he/she wants to a lso be accepted by his/her family, it is a feeling that human beings go through. This is the same feeling that Kane felt in Genesis towards God that led him to kill his brother, as he struggled with acceptance, he felt like an outcast, which is a feeling that no man wants to feel. Thus releasing his dormant ‘evil’ nature, separating himself from the good.This is the same notion that William Golding went through in â€Å"The Lord of Flies† this is the idea that when man is separated from good, he has no alternative but to turn its ‘original’ state of evilness. One such writer is William Golding, and one such book is The Lord of The Flies. As the appended essay in the popular Capricorn edition reveals, â€Å"the theme (according to the author) is an attempt to trace the defects of society back to the defects of human nature. † Here Golding and Ardrey speak with a single voice: mans nature is the central determiner of what man does.Ardrey watches animals in the wild because â€Å"only in a state of nature can we be sure that we are observing true animal behaviour. † Golding places his innocent schoolboys on an uninhabited, inescapable island. Ardrey re-constructs prehistory, when a subhuman creature made its way toward becoming man. Golding, who has also written a book about prehistory (The Inheritors, Harcourt, 1962), traces reversion of his British youth to a kind of subhuman existence. Likewise Stevenson goes through another cycle and almost similar stage of Human nature.His work â€Å"The curios Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde† has been something that also survives time as it still has relevance today. The idea has found its way onto cinema screens in films such as the â€Å"Incredible Hulk† the transformation of Jekyll is presented to us as a ‘one way journey’ as my Hyde’s character is much stronger than Jekyll’s and he is constantly seeing himself through Hyde’s eye s. Eventually the power of Hyde becomes too much for him and there is no other possibility but to destroy his body, inevitably killing off both consciousnesses.Both stories (â€Å"The importance of Being Earnest† and â€Å"The Curios Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde†) do however have one major factor in common, they both understand the ‘power of class’ and social hierarchy. All their main characters are middle classed or higher because they wanted to appeal to the greater half of their society. The reason being, the lower classed where the outcasts of their society, so if these themes had been about the lower classed people in the higher class will not pay much attention to the lower classed.

The Origin Of Hamlet - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 5 Words: 1353 Downloads: 3 Date added: 2019/04/10 Category Literature Essay Level High school Tags: Hamlet Essay William Shakespeare Essay Did you like this example? The origin of Hamlet is believed to date back to the death of his son Hamnet in 1596 of an unknown illness, and it is thought to be a prominent factor in leading Shakespeare to write Hamlet. To go along with this, early in 1601 (the year he released Hamlet), he lost his father. The grieve that he felt from the death of his child and father left him in a state of sorrow which led him to write this great tragedy. Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "The Origin Of Hamlet" essay for you Create order The death of his father may be a reason to why Shakespeare writes of a grieving son because this is a manner in which he is trying to express his pain. The basic plotline for Hamlet stems from the Danish legend of Amleth in which a king is murdered by his brother who then goes and marries the ex-kings wife. The ex-kings son then plots against his uncle in order to obtain revenge for the death of his father. There are many similarities between these two plays, and it is believed that Shakespeare may have possibly adapted ideas from Amleth. The first of Amleth was written in Latin, so it is highly unlikely he read this play from its first version. However, a French adaptation was printed in 1971, and this is the version that Shakespeare more than likely read. Since there was no written data or historical data from this time period about him, nothing can be fully confirmed. There is no physical evidence that completely confirms any specific theories there are, but most evidence proves that these two are most likely to be the origins of Hamlet. The play of Hamlet was written in 1601, and there are three other versions of the play that was made. They were released in 1603, 1604, and 1623 while each are a version of the original Hamlet each one is said to have its own background and history. During the time of the release of Hamlet, the reign of Queen Elizabeth the firsts was coming to an end. The people of England had no idea who the successor would be or what would happen to England during this time. The queen had no heir to take the throne since she was the last in her family. A great wave of uncertainty and fear of change swept throughout the nation, and Shakespeare forms Hamlet to display this skepticism and uncertainty. In Hamlet, the king is murdered by his brother who jumps onto the throne and self proclaims himself to be the ruler of the nation. Shakespeare plays on the fear of peoples change with the ruler, and he uses this current event of the time to implement a similar storyline. This was not very common at this time, and it brought a sense of change to theater. This is what makes him successful for his time period. Shakespeare is known to many as one of the most influential and expert playwrights ever, and he had lots of success throughout his career. This play was written right in the midst of Shakespeares career, and it was the 22nd piece he had written at the time. He went on to write a total of 37 different pieces which shows his great expertise and credentials that go with his name. This has become one of his most popular piece of work, and it is being recited worldwide on a daily basis while also factoring into modern day literature. When the play first began to be released, it was met with mixed reviews. At the time, the most genre for plays by him were histories. Hamlet on the other hand is a tragedy which was not as prominent as histories during this time period. Most critics during the mid 17th century were indifferent towards Hamlet, and they actually preferred many other pieces of work over this. It wasnt until approximately 80 years after Hamlet was first performed that it was officially published and copies were handed out on a wide scale. However even with the lack of interest and popularity that was shown towards Hamlet, Shakespeare was able to obtain some of the premier performers of the time.This included John Heminges, Thomas Pope, Augustine Phillips, and Robert Armin. All the roles were played by males which was a commonality of this time period. Women had little to no role in the acting industry at this time, and all roles no matter the gender were filled by males. This continued to be the case for a long time to come until 1960 at one of Shakespeares plays 44 years after his death. Overtime, Hamlet has become regarded as a masterpiece, and it will forever be one. It is seen to be one of the most influential and greatest plays of all time with numerous spinoffs. Since the official release of Hamlet in 1601, it has only grown in popularity. At first it was a little slow because tragedies were not very common during the first few decades of the 1600s. After the 1660s the traction picked up, and it became extremely popular. Especially throughout the 18th century, people would go watch it anytime it was being performed. It helped people rise to celebrity status throughout this time period. This made the play even more popular because many of the viewers would come to watch the play to see these celebrities in London. Thomas Betterton portrayed the character of Prince Hamlet for over 50 years, and this led him to a great load of stardom. He began portraying him in 1661, and he was still receiving praise well into the 18th century for his part. In the 18th century, the popularity was mainly centralized in London. It wasnt until early in the 19th century that it became popular elsewhere. It was performed to Napoleon (the ruler of France), and he sl owly opened up to it. People begin to love the play as the 19th century continues on, and people grow greatly fond of Shakespeare. They begin to greatly praise him by devoting art on an international scale to him, and this includes majority of Europe. As time moved on, Hamlet begin to grow even in more popularity. There have been 13 Hamlet movies which have been made and each have been extremely popular. Furthermore, it is performed on a daily basis at theaters all around the world. There have also been multiple loose adaptations with movies, tv shows or books that have plots based on the play. One major loose adaptation is Lion King because the kings brother (Scar) murders the king (Mufasa) and in the end the son (Simba) enacts his revenge on his hateful uncle. Leading it to be eerily similar to Hamlet with there similar plots. Being able to achieve a successful legacy is an extremely difficult task, but Hamlet achieves this with ease. It is viewed as one of the most prolific plays ever written, and it continues to be read and performed daily. Back in the 17-18th centuries, it helped bring lots of attention to theater due to its extreme popularity. Hamlet completely revolutionized the theater setting with all of the twists and turns it provided throughout the play. It helped bring a new era upon theater, and it brought along new genres and plays. Stories began to change and evolve to attempt to match the greatness of Hamlet and Shakespeare.Not only did it impact theater in the 17th and 18th century, it has greatly impacted modern literature as well, and many other authors have utilized specific literary tools that were used in Hamlet in their own writing. However, there are a few critiques to Hamlet which exist with the character himself. These are because people wonder why Hamlet did not kill Claudius at an earlier time because he was given multiple opportunities to do so. There is also the great debate as to whether Hamlet was pretending to be crazy or if it was a ploy he was playing. Even with these great debates, Hamlet has an extraordinary legacy of completely changing the playwright world, and this leads it to earn the honor of being one of the greatest and most influential plays ever made.